Over the course of my career, I’ve seen such a shift in approaches to how we develop applications. I was raised in the traditional waterfall method, like many of us. Then I experienced the agile method and saw its benefits as well as limitations. Today, as a CIO overseeing large teams and diverse organizational needs, I see the need for both methods to co-exist and to cross-pollinate. But can they co-exist when they are so different? I’d love to hear your experiences.
How can agile and traditional waterfall development methodologies co-exist?
UC IT NewsFebruary 20, 2014All Articlescollaboration, Tom Andriola, UC CIO
- NEWS: Women Rock IT 2024
- NEWS: UC Office of the President and leaders from Amazon, Google, and Microsoft provide important views and considerations regarding AI at the university
- NEWS: Kay Burke and Russ Cucina, UCSF, honored on Becker’s List for significant hospital and health system contributions
- NEWS: Investing in Future Cybersecurity Leaders
- EVENT: UC Irvine’s Waypoints Symposium March 25-26 – Register Now
- NEWS: UC Office of the President Technology Delivery Services annual review
- NEWS: Oliver Kreylos, UC Davis, wins the golden Larry L. Sautter UC Tech Award for Innovation in Information Technology
- NEWS: UC Davis Health’s Anesthesia Department elevates patient care with cutting-edge innovations in the February Epic update
- CAREER: Inaugural University of California certificate on AI offered through UCSC Silicon Valley Extension – Register Now
- EVENT: UC Health Conference “From Data to Action: Driving Healthcare Innovation” April 17-18 – Register Now